Insurance Whistleblower Healings from Phillips & Cohen Cases Bring Novo Nordisk’s Victoza Settlement To $60 Million

Washington, Sept. 5, 2017,/ PRNewswire/– A whistleblower claim submitted by Phillips & Cohen LLP in 2010 versus Novo Nordisk declaring unlawful marketing, promo, and sale of its very popular diabetes drug, Victoza, has been dealt with as part of the pharmaceutical company’s $58.65 million settlement with the federal government revealed today for supposed health care scams and Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act infractions.

In addition, Novo Nordisk has accepted pay $1.1 million to the state of California and $350,000 to the state of Illinois to settle different whistleblower court cases brought by Phillips & Cohen declaring scams versus personal commercial health insurance providers. Those state settlements bring the overall that Novo Nordisk will pay to $60 million– consisting of $48 million to settle claims of prohibited marketing, promo and sale of Victoza from 2010 to 2014, in the offense of the False Claims Act.

Both California and Illinois will get more funds from the state whistleblower insurance cases than they will from the Medicare and Medicaid settlement, which sets aside those states $84,000 and $26,000, respectively.

” Novo Nordisk had the ability to considerably increase its incomes as an outcome of the supposed ‘off-label’ marketing of Victoza that motivated medical professionals to recommend it for unapproved usages,” stated Erika Kelton, a whistleblower lawyer with Phillips & Cohen. “Victoza is a costly drug with severe possible negative effects that ought to be used just for specifically authorized treatments.”.

Phillips & Cohen’s federal “qui tam” (whistleblower) case brought under the False Claims Act is among 7 “qui tam” claims submitted by 11 whistleblowers in between 2010 and 2016 that have been dealt with under the federal settlement arrangement.

The supposed off-label marketing needlessly increased the expenses for federal government health care programs while apparently threatening clients, according to the whistleblower problems and the federal government. Phillips & Cohen’s customer, Peter Dastous, was a Novo Nordisk sales agent.

His claim declares that Novo Nordisk released a substantial project to promote Victoza for off-label utilizes, which had not been authorized by the United States Food and Drug Administration. These usages consisted of treatment of weight reduction in clients with all kinds of diabetes or who were pre-diabetic, although the FDA had authorized it to deal with just clients with Type 2 diabetes.

Phillips & Cohen also used obscure California and Illinois state insurance laws to recuperate funds connected to supposed losses of personal insurance companies from the supposed off-label marketing of Victoza. The California Insurance Fraud Prevention Act and the Illinois Insurance Claims Fraud Prevention Act enable whistleblowers to take legal action against and recuperate funds from entities that defraud personal insurance providers, consisting of health insurance companies.

” California and Illinois are the only states with laws that motivate whistleblowers to expose scams versus personal insurance providers and reward the whistleblowers for doing so,” stated Larry Zoglin, a whistleblower lawyer with Phillips & Cohen.

” We value the deal with this case by federal and state lawyers and the assistance we got from the workplace of California Insurance Commissioner Dave Jones,” stated lawyer Kelton.